As one conference closes, another opens...
David Cameron strode into the Conservative Conference in his usual, striking, arrogant confidence; the pure arrogance, when you can almost see "born to rule" self inscribed across his forehead...
This was of course his first appearance at Conference as Prime Minister but little did he know that several days later he would be facing the fury of his own supporters...
By Wednesday, he would be mauled by his own party;
Time to feel the aggressive wrath of the rich, stay-at-home mothers...
It would appear the slashing of child benefits to those within the top 15% of families on highest income (a.k.a the filthy rich) has caused quite a fuss...
I wonder why?
Oh yes, because half of the Tories are the filthy rich, whilst the other 50% at least like to think they are...
For once, the Tory plans protect the poor over the rich; a rare and unusual occurance.
My advice is; make the most of it.
I had to read the article in the Guardian twice, for the concept of such an occasion to actually sink in...
It has to be said Osborne; pretty good for a Tory.
But for the Tories, the policy has provoked controversy and division...
The slashing of child benefits, in this way, will successfully raise £1bn towards George Osborne's plans to cut Britain's £149bn deficit within the five year lifespan of the coalition.
But by Wednesday, as Mr. Cameron left what should have been a celebratory rally, he had been effectively hung, drawn and quartered by his own party members and his reputation for being 'cool under fire' had been ruined...
Personally, as a Lib Dem and so supporting fairness, I completely support the cuts to those families where one parent earns over £44,000 - why should rich mothers be paid to stay at home whilst the social services struggle to cater for those who are mentally ill or disabled? Why should they be paid to lounge around when Britain has one of the largest deficits in Europe, that needs to be cut?
What a shame...
Some filthy rich Tory family won't be able to afford the brand new BMW they've always wanted...
Ever heard of a Peugeot?
So these cuts...
For once, excluding all other policies and values; I could almost be a Tory, and be proud to be a Tory...
...And believe me; that's saying something.
Friday, 8 October 2010
Thursday, 7 October 2010
Another day in 'Libdemdom'...
By Sunday, I had just about got used to finding myself stood just metres away from Nick Clegg, Simon Hughes, Vince Cable or someone of equal epicness from the party...
As a result of a delayed breakfast and the added distraction of the Andrew Marr show on in the hotel lobby, I sadly missed most of the speech by Tavish Scott which I had aimed to see that morning.
Therefore, my first full session was the Consultative Session on Strategy from 10.40am-12.10pm.
Don't be fooled by the name - this was actually really interesting...
It was a discussion as to how the Lib Dems should alter their strategy to recruit support and new members following the coalition. Key points explored included:
1. We MUST separate ourselves from the Tories and reiterate that this is a coalition NOT a merge.
We can still keep our deal through passing Tory policies but show we don't necessarily agree with them. It was suggested that as Mr.Cable has done, more coalition key players need to reassure members that just because we've agreed to help pass them; we don't solidly agree with them.
There was also the idea that we need to 'shout from the rooftops' our successes in government, so the public knows who has done what. One person raised the idea of including Lib Dem achievements in editions of local focus papers; I thought this would be a particularly successful way of raising and keeping support.
2. Liberal Youth needs to be acknowledged as a vital, precious resource; the future of the party.
Liberal Youth wasn't mentioned at all within the first half of the session, I was rather concerned about this, so much so; I was considering making an intervention at half time. However, luckily I wasn't confident enough to do so as it was then focused on within the second half.
3. Activists need to be valued more.
Instead of just being handed a stack of leaflets to deliver.
Luckily, I have not experienced this as my local party have been extremely welcoming and appreciative but I can understand that this could be a problem elsewhere.
There were many other points made, but sadly I didn't take notes during this discussion - too busy listening!
After the Consultative Session, conference filled up rapidly with party members and much to my annoyance, the all consuming sprawl and chaos of the media...
Because Danny Alexander was due to make his first conference speech.
His speech centered around the cuts and he explained why they are being carried out; "Not because it is easy but because it is right."
With regards to the coalition, he described how; "One party at war with itself has been replaced by 2 united parties."And impressively pointed out how the Lib Dems have achieved key policies e.g. Increasing Capital Gains Tax and taking 900,000 low earners out of tax; all in 13 weeks. Labour had 13 years; and they failed to achieve this. He also pointed out how Labour shamefully promised money to communities when they knew there was "no money left" and how last year they spent £150 billion more than was payed by tax.
He reinforced the idea that efficiency savings alone will not solve the deficit, hence why cuts have to be made. He then proceeded to the tackling of tax avoidance and described how it was unacceptable at the best of times but now more so than ever. He therefore promised a fivefold increase in prosecutions, which would gather £7billion to help conquer the deficit.
After a truly inspiring, impressive, cleverly linked and worded speech...
He ended promising fairness was in his mind every step of the way; an outright promise to remain close to the values held as a Liberal Democrat within this coalition.
Next followed the Welsh Liberal Democrats presentation...
Much to my embarassment now; rather foolishly and in a typically English way, it had never occurred to me that Welsh Liberal Democrats even existed!
Therefore, I found this presentation particuarly interesting and informative...
Similarly to Danny Alexander, the Welsh Liberal Democrats talked about the betrayal of Labour and also Plaid Cymru through their current coalition. The coalition had promised the establishment of a daily Welsh newspaper, 6.5 thousand new homes, the recognition of Welsh as a language and to halve child poverty.
All of this hasn't yet been achieved.
Kirsty Williams, as a fairly new Leader of the Welsh Liberal Democrats has been making a huge impact already; it was explained how she condemned the coalition for waste; over £1 billion in health.
Liberal Democrat achievements in Wales include:
1. A complete review of overseas investment.
2. The separation of infertility and maternity patients in hospitals.
3. Guaranteed healthy eating in schools across Wales.
4. 40% CO2 reduction target.
5. Regeneration of Swansea; including the building of a huge leisure complex.
6. Passing of the "green dragon" law, a law which promotes eco-friendly behaviour.
7. Success in education; Wrexham has been Lib Dem territory for 6 years and 47% of grades are now between A-C at GCSE as a result of education strategy.
8. The regeneration of Cardiff.
Although perhaps slightly biased, the Welsh Lib Dems described how they were bringing new hope to the people of Wales.
From their extensive list of achievements, it really does seem that way.
In many ways, their presentation was just as inspiring to that of Danny Alexander's; it was brilliant to see such dedication, enthusiasm and team spirit.
Those who spoke at the conference were:
1. Kirsty Williams (Leader of the Welsh Liberal Democrats)
2.Councillor Aled Roberts (Leader of Wrexham Council)
3. Veronica German (Assembly Member for South East Wales)
4. Wyn Williams (Welsh Assembly Candidate for Montgomeryshire)
Next followed my final conference session but it was certainly a good way to end the whole experience;
Nick Clegg's Questions and Answers.
Managed to 'bagsy' some front seats, although this did have the disadvantage of media attention...
A lot of notes taken... 3.5 A4 sides to be precise!
Ideas explored included...
1. Could Nick still be trusted with the party?
Clegg replied yes and outlined some of the key Liberal Democrat policies that were being passed in government. For instance, taking 900,000 low earners out of tax, implementing a banking levy and a pupil premium. He acknowledged that the cuts weren't easy but pointed out it was unfair to leave our debt for future generations to deal with.
2. Many FE colleges are not fit for purpose, how will this be sorted?
Clegg promised the millions of pounds were to be injected into the FE budget and unlike Labour, this promise of funding would be kept. He also stressed the importance of more promotion of FE colleges as more often than not University is made to appear as the only option.
3. Pakistan Floods: Although 1.5million people have been covered by aid, this is not enough - how are the government helping?
Clegg talked of his own personal visit to the country and described how shocking it was, explaining how you cannot capture the unimaginable vastness on the small TV screens we have at home. He acknowledged that over 20million people had been displaced by the floods, a total which is equivalent to 1/3 of the UK. In response he declared that that very day the government had increased upon the £60million already issued to Pakistan to help provide temporary education and financial support for farmers.
4. When will the detention of children end?
It will end; Clegg reiterated this several times. He described how detention was only used prior to deportation, but that the government were looking for an alternate solution, describing the current system as a "barbaric" part of our asylum system.
5. Why are the Lib Dems being blamed for cuts but the Tories praised for our policies?
He pointed out that it was only 5months into a 5year parliament and therefore it was early days and that the mark is clear to see, we just need to explain. He agreed that ministers should express some dislike towards Tory policy, but obviously being in coalition can often be a very fragile situation. He then explained that we cannot cross the 't's and dot the 'i's of the Lib Dem Manifesto because we didn't win the election.
6. How can we maintain our independence within the coalition?
Clegg instantly replied with "we are left, they are right; we stand firm in our ideological views" and that you can share power but still keep your values. He described how we need to keep internal democratic debate alive and how we are currently being "beaten up by Labour pro media who are indulging themselves in the betrayal myth", whilst it is they who have betrayed the public; they didn't even have the decency to announce their planned cuts.
Regrettably, the Question and Answer session marked the 'beginning of the end' of my conference experience...
After buying a Liberal Democrat mug, one very reluctant Emma departed from conference...
The rest of Sunday and most of Monday was spent in a solitary, silent, reflective, blissful world of yellow...
Regrets?
... Perhaps not taking enough notes and not attending enough fringe events.
But it has to be said, conference was an absolute... SUCCESS.
Great experience; Great debate; Great people.
It was an honour to be surrounded by people who have the same passion for politics as me and also who share some of the same political values as fellow Liberal Democrats.
So...
Bring on the Spring Conference!
As a result of a delayed breakfast and the added distraction of the Andrew Marr show on in the hotel lobby, I sadly missed most of the speech by Tavish Scott which I had aimed to see that morning.
Therefore, my first full session was the Consultative Session on Strategy from 10.40am-12.10pm.
Don't be fooled by the name - this was actually really interesting...
It was a discussion as to how the Lib Dems should alter their strategy to recruit support and new members following the coalition. Key points explored included:
1. We MUST separate ourselves from the Tories and reiterate that this is a coalition NOT a merge.
We can still keep our deal through passing Tory policies but show we don't necessarily agree with them. It was suggested that as Mr.Cable has done, more coalition key players need to reassure members that just because we've agreed to help pass them; we don't solidly agree with them.
There was also the idea that we need to 'shout from the rooftops' our successes in government, so the public knows who has done what. One person raised the idea of including Lib Dem achievements in editions of local focus papers; I thought this would be a particularly successful way of raising and keeping support.
2. Liberal Youth needs to be acknowledged as a vital, precious resource; the future of the party.
Liberal Youth wasn't mentioned at all within the first half of the session, I was rather concerned about this, so much so; I was considering making an intervention at half time. However, luckily I wasn't confident enough to do so as it was then focused on within the second half.
3. Activists need to be valued more.
Instead of just being handed a stack of leaflets to deliver.
Luckily, I have not experienced this as my local party have been extremely welcoming and appreciative but I can understand that this could be a problem elsewhere.
There were many other points made, but sadly I didn't take notes during this discussion - too busy listening!
After the Consultative Session, conference filled up rapidly with party members and much to my annoyance, the all consuming sprawl and chaos of the media...
Because Danny Alexander was due to make his first conference speech.
His speech centered around the cuts and he explained why they are being carried out; "Not because it is easy but because it is right."
With regards to the coalition, he described how; "One party at war with itself has been replaced by 2 united parties."And impressively pointed out how the Lib Dems have achieved key policies e.g. Increasing Capital Gains Tax and taking 900,000 low earners out of tax; all in 13 weeks. Labour had 13 years; and they failed to achieve this. He also pointed out how Labour shamefully promised money to communities when they knew there was "no money left" and how last year they spent £150 billion more than was payed by tax.
He reinforced the idea that efficiency savings alone will not solve the deficit, hence why cuts have to be made. He then proceeded to the tackling of tax avoidance and described how it was unacceptable at the best of times but now more so than ever. He therefore promised a fivefold increase in prosecutions, which would gather £7billion to help conquer the deficit.
After a truly inspiring, impressive, cleverly linked and worded speech...
He ended promising fairness was in his mind every step of the way; an outright promise to remain close to the values held as a Liberal Democrat within this coalition.
Next followed the Welsh Liberal Democrats presentation...
Much to my embarassment now; rather foolishly and in a typically English way, it had never occurred to me that Welsh Liberal Democrats even existed!
Therefore, I found this presentation particuarly interesting and informative...
Similarly to Danny Alexander, the Welsh Liberal Democrats talked about the betrayal of Labour and also Plaid Cymru through their current coalition. The coalition had promised the establishment of a daily Welsh newspaper, 6.5 thousand new homes, the recognition of Welsh as a language and to halve child poverty.
All of this hasn't yet been achieved.
Kirsty Williams, as a fairly new Leader of the Welsh Liberal Democrats has been making a huge impact already; it was explained how she condemned the coalition for waste; over £1 billion in health.
Liberal Democrat achievements in Wales include:
1. A complete review of overseas investment.
2. The separation of infertility and maternity patients in hospitals.
3. Guaranteed healthy eating in schools across Wales.
4. 40% CO2 reduction target.
5. Regeneration of Swansea; including the building of a huge leisure complex.
6. Passing of the "green dragon" law, a law which promotes eco-friendly behaviour.
7. Success in education; Wrexham has been Lib Dem territory for 6 years and 47% of grades are now between A-C at GCSE as a result of education strategy.
8. The regeneration of Cardiff.
Although perhaps slightly biased, the Welsh Lib Dems described how they were bringing new hope to the people of Wales.
From their extensive list of achievements, it really does seem that way.
In many ways, their presentation was just as inspiring to that of Danny Alexander's; it was brilliant to see such dedication, enthusiasm and team spirit.
Those who spoke at the conference were:
1. Kirsty Williams (Leader of the Welsh Liberal Democrats)
2.Councillor Aled Roberts (Leader of Wrexham Council)
3. Veronica German (Assembly Member for South East Wales)
4. Wyn Williams (Welsh Assembly Candidate for Montgomeryshire)
Next followed my final conference session but it was certainly a good way to end the whole experience;
Nick Clegg's Questions and Answers.
Managed to 'bagsy' some front seats, although this did have the disadvantage of media attention...
A lot of notes taken... 3.5 A4 sides to be precise!
Ideas explored included...
1. Could Nick still be trusted with the party?
Clegg replied yes and outlined some of the key Liberal Democrat policies that were being passed in government. For instance, taking 900,000 low earners out of tax, implementing a banking levy and a pupil premium. He acknowledged that the cuts weren't easy but pointed out it was unfair to leave our debt for future generations to deal with.
2. Many FE colleges are not fit for purpose, how will this be sorted?
Clegg promised the millions of pounds were to be injected into the FE budget and unlike Labour, this promise of funding would be kept. He also stressed the importance of more promotion of FE colleges as more often than not University is made to appear as the only option.
3. Pakistan Floods: Although 1.5million people have been covered by aid, this is not enough - how are the government helping?
Clegg talked of his own personal visit to the country and described how shocking it was, explaining how you cannot capture the unimaginable vastness on the small TV screens we have at home. He acknowledged that over 20million people had been displaced by the floods, a total which is equivalent to 1/3 of the UK. In response he declared that that very day the government had increased upon the £60million already issued to Pakistan to help provide temporary education and financial support for farmers.
4. When will the detention of children end?
It will end; Clegg reiterated this several times. He described how detention was only used prior to deportation, but that the government were looking for an alternate solution, describing the current system as a "barbaric" part of our asylum system.
5. Why are the Lib Dems being blamed for cuts but the Tories praised for our policies?
He pointed out that it was only 5months into a 5year parliament and therefore it was early days and that the mark is clear to see, we just need to explain. He agreed that ministers should express some dislike towards Tory policy, but obviously being in coalition can often be a very fragile situation. He then explained that we cannot cross the 't's and dot the 'i's of the Lib Dem Manifesto because we didn't win the election.
6. How can we maintain our independence within the coalition?
Clegg instantly replied with "we are left, they are right; we stand firm in our ideological views" and that you can share power but still keep your values. He described how we need to keep internal democratic debate alive and how we are currently being "beaten up by Labour pro media who are indulging themselves in the betrayal myth", whilst it is they who have betrayed the public; they didn't even have the decency to announce their planned cuts.
Regrettably, the Question and Answer session marked the 'beginning of the end' of my conference experience...
After buying a Liberal Democrat mug, one very reluctant Emma departed from conference...
The rest of Sunday and most of Monday was spent in a solitary, silent, reflective, blissful world of yellow...
Regrets?
... Perhaps not taking enough notes and not attending enough fringe events.
But it has to be said, conference was an absolute... SUCCESS.
Great experience; Great debate; Great people.
It was an honour to be surrounded by people who have the same passion for politics as me and also who share some of the same political values as fellow Liberal Democrats.
So...
Bring on the Spring Conference!
Monday, 4 October 2010
And when you pass security for what feels like the 100th time; it finally hits you. You're at the Liberal Democrat Conference. And we're in Government.
Conference... Conference... Conference...
"Initially daunting, then it becomes interesting...
...and surprisingly right wing."
Art Malik (Actor and supporter of the Liberal Democrats) on his first experience of conference.
Daunting? Yes.
Interesting? Definitely.
Right wing? Not so sure.
This blog will differ from the usual style.
Unlike usual, I'd like to talk about my own experience; my experience as a first-timer at the Lib Dem Conference last weekend.
Saturday morning; I wasn't really sure what to expect.
Having registered in my trade mark style (on the last minute), I had only been sent a brief letter and my conference pass by post. The rest had to be collected on site.
Therefore, I really had no idea what I was letting myself in for.
As I disembarked the bus in Liverpool city centre and headed vaguely in the direction of the ACC; I started to notice strange splashes of yellow amongst the typically urban grey surroundings...
Serious looking suited persons passing by; and that glimpse of yellow again, again, again...
I am of course referring to the yellow lanyards worn by conference members. With each passing lanyard, I found myself walking faster and faster as the excitement kicked in. Eventually, having dodged people, cars, buses and protesters I found myself standing outside the ACC. After a brief salute to the Lib Dem flags outside I stepped into the chaos of the security tent.
After receiving my own precious lanyard and having got through security without any bomb scares, I then proceeded to pick up mybrick sorry conference papers from the designated desk.
Bewildered, and with an hour or so to pass until Conference was formally opened, I explored the maze of stalls on the ground floor, fighting off the woman at the Womens Liberal Democrats' stall who had a worrying obsession with Eleanor Rathburn...
Eventually, it reached 2.30pm and I excitedly entered the Conference Hall. Baroness Walmsley formally opened the conference by making a short speech with as much boasting of "we're in Government now" as possible which of course, was all good stuff.
From 2.35-4.15 I intermittently sat through three different reports; The Federal Conference Committee report , The Federal Policy Committee report and finally the membership subscriptions report. To be brutally honest, these weren't exactly enthralling but perhaps this was because I was too overwhelmed by the whole concept of conference it was hard to concentrate.
Then followed a debate on 'Transactions Transparency and conflicts of interest in Government' which was interesting although hard to follow.
However, having looked back at the Agenda when at home and having studied the topic in more detail it made much more sense.
The debate looked at imposing a Civil Service Law which prevents public servants from being appointed when they are involved in (e.g. through shares) or even outright own the companies and services they are dealing with.
Another key area of concern was public servants leaving their posts to take up highly rewarded roles with suppliers or government organisations, as a result of these organisations benefiting from the decisions made by such public servants.
The debate, was fast moving and raised a number of issues for instance what exactly counts for ownership? It was pointed out that many people invested their pensions in a company, therefore, most people would be excluded.
Eventually, the idea of passing a Civil Service Law was favoured by conference and it was pointed out that it was strange that we didn't already have one as so many of our European neighbours did.
Later followed my first and most regrettably my only fringe event; The AV Rally...
The place was heaving.
This was to be expected though as of course the AV referendum is crucial to the Lib Dems as a party.
There was also the small matter that a certain Nick Clegg would be making an appearance...
Other speakers included;
Art Malik (Actor and Supporter of the Lib Dems)
Jo Swinson (Lib Dem MP)
Tim Farron (Lib Dem MP and always a good laugh!)
Martin Bell (Former Independent MP)
Pam Giddy (Leader of the Yes to AV campaign)
AV Balloons filled the air and it was rather ironic to see serious looking politicians batting them about like 5 year olds at a Mc Donald's party...
There was a good atmosphere; the rally was exciting, passionate and unifying but with a serious undertone as Nick Clegg warned coalition doubters;
"Don't let the best be the enemy of the good."
No, this isn't Proportional Representation but it's better than first past the post.
Although, personally I think anything, even a 'put your heads down and hands up' school style voting system would be more democratic that first past the post...
And that was Saturday.
I have decided to split my conference write-up into two days as I feel each day was a separate experience on a variety of different levels. For instance; Sunday was much more settled and therefore I paid more attention to the content instead of the atmosphere of the conference.
"Initially daunting, then it becomes interesting...
...and surprisingly right wing."
Art Malik (Actor and supporter of the Liberal Democrats) on his first experience of conference.
Daunting? Yes.
Interesting? Definitely.
Right wing? Not so sure.
This blog will differ from the usual style.
Unlike usual, I'd like to talk about my own experience; my experience as a first-timer at the Lib Dem Conference last weekend.
Saturday morning; I wasn't really sure what to expect.
Having registered in my trade mark style (on the last minute), I had only been sent a brief letter and my conference pass by post. The rest had to be collected on site.
Therefore, I really had no idea what I was letting myself in for.
As I disembarked the bus in Liverpool city centre and headed vaguely in the direction of the ACC; I started to notice strange splashes of yellow amongst the typically urban grey surroundings...
Serious looking suited persons passing by; and that glimpse of yellow again, again, again...
I am of course referring to the yellow lanyards worn by conference members. With each passing lanyard, I found myself walking faster and faster as the excitement kicked in. Eventually, having dodged people, cars, buses and protesters I found myself standing outside the ACC. After a brief salute to the Lib Dem flags outside I stepped into the chaos of the security tent.
After receiving my own precious lanyard and having got through security without any bomb scares, I then proceeded to pick up my
Bewildered, and with an hour or so to pass until Conference was formally opened, I explored the maze of stalls on the ground floor, fighting off the woman at the Womens Liberal Democrats' stall who had a worrying obsession with Eleanor Rathburn...
Eventually, it reached 2.30pm and I excitedly entered the Conference Hall. Baroness Walmsley formally opened the conference by making a short speech with as much boasting of "we're in Government now" as possible which of course, was all good stuff.
From 2.35-4.15 I intermittently sat through three different reports; The Federal Conference Committee report , The Federal Policy Committee report and finally the membership subscriptions report. To be brutally honest, these weren't exactly enthralling but perhaps this was because I was too overwhelmed by the whole concept of conference it was hard to concentrate.
Then followed a debate on 'Transactions Transparency and conflicts of interest in Government' which was interesting although hard to follow.
However, having looked back at the Agenda when at home and having studied the topic in more detail it made much more sense.
The debate looked at imposing a Civil Service Law which prevents public servants from being appointed when they are involved in (e.g. through shares) or even outright own the companies and services they are dealing with.
Another key area of concern was public servants leaving their posts to take up highly rewarded roles with suppliers or government organisations, as a result of these organisations benefiting from the decisions made by such public servants.
The debate, was fast moving and raised a number of issues for instance what exactly counts for ownership? It was pointed out that many people invested their pensions in a company, therefore, most people would be excluded.
Eventually, the idea of passing a Civil Service Law was favoured by conference and it was pointed out that it was strange that we didn't already have one as so many of our European neighbours did.
Later followed my first and most regrettably my only fringe event; The AV Rally...
The place was heaving.
This was to be expected though as of course the AV referendum is crucial to the Lib Dems as a party.
There was also the small matter that a certain Nick Clegg would be making an appearance...
Other speakers included;
Art Malik (Actor and Supporter of the Lib Dems)
Jo Swinson (Lib Dem MP)
Tim Farron (Lib Dem MP and always a good laugh!)
Martin Bell (Former Independent MP)
Pam Giddy (Leader of the Yes to AV campaign)
AV Balloons filled the air and it was rather ironic to see serious looking politicians batting them about like 5 year olds at a Mc Donald's party...
There was a good atmosphere; the rally was exciting, passionate and unifying but with a serious undertone as Nick Clegg warned coalition doubters;
"Don't let the best be the enemy of the good."
No, this isn't Proportional Representation but it's better than first past the post.
Although, personally I think anything, even a 'put your heads down and hands up' school style voting system would be more democratic that first past the post...
And that was Saturday.
I have decided to split my conference write-up into two days as I feel each day was a separate experience on a variety of different levels. For instance; Sunday was much more settled and therefore I paid more attention to the content instead of the atmosphere of the conference.
Thursday, 9 September 2010
US Koran Burning...
It's repulsive.
"It is possibly time for us in a new way to actually stand up, confront terrorism," Mr Jones told reporters.
This is hypocrisy; how is the burning of the Koran, a sacred text for Muslims, not an act of religious terrorism?
Granted, it is not perhaps on the 9/11 scale but it's still an offensive act which will encourage terrorism not prevent it. Obama described the plans of Mr Jones as a "recruitment bonanza" for Al-Qaeda.
Obama also pointed out that if the burning did go ahead in Gainesville, Florida it would endanger US troops in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Whilst, William Hague, British foreign secretary, when asked how the burnings would affect British troops in Afghanistan replied "It certainly won't help."
It has also been suggested that it will not only be our troops who will be put at risk by the pastor's actions; Interpol has issued a global alert claiming the burning could instigate "violent attacks on innocent people". As a result of this warning, the US government has warned American tourists abroad to be careful and avoid areas where protests may take place.
Terry Jones, pastor of a small church in the sleepy town of Gainesville leads a congregation of around 50 people. He planned to hold a mass burning of Korans to commemorate 9/11.
What was planned to be a small, local ceremony has now become a major issue on the world stage, as a result of media and political intervention.
The US government finds itself in a tricky situation; officials cannot prevent Mr Jones as intervention would be against the US constitution's promise of freedom of speech. Yet, if the burning should go ahead, not only is it damaging to America's reputation but also poses huge security risks.
Comments made against the Koran burnings:
Downing Street; "Primarily this is an issue for the US, but clearly the government's view is that we would not condone the burning of any book. We would strongly oppose any attempt to offend any member of any religious or ethnic group. We are committed to religious tolerance."
OIC Secretary General (Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu); "The culture of peaceful co-existence and inter communal and inter-religious tolerance that the international community is trying to achieve is under threat from marginal and extremist fanatics."
William Hague; The burning of the Koran would be offensive not just to Muslims but to all supporters of religious freedom and tolerance worldwide. Eid is a time of celebration, charitable giving and family gathering. To seek to mar it in this calculated way would be selfish and provocative in the extreme."
Tony Blair; "I deplore the act of burning the Koran. It is disrespectful, wrong and will be widely condemned by people of all faiths and none. In no way does this represent the view of any sensible person in the West or any other part of the world. You do not have to be a Muslim to share a sense of deep concern at such a disrespectful way to treat the Holy Book of Islam. Rather than burn the Koran, I would encourage people to read it."
There has not been news yet as to whether Mr Jones plans to continue the Koran burnings; despite worldwide pressure for him to cancel his plans. Meanwhile the rest of us struggle to comprehend, as shown above, why we are having to persuade such a man, not to commit a KKK reminiscent offence in the supposedly tolerant society of today.
"It is possibly time for us in a new way to actually stand up, confront terrorism," Mr Jones told reporters.
This is hypocrisy; how is the burning of the Koran, a sacred text for Muslims, not an act of religious terrorism?
Granted, it is not perhaps on the 9/11 scale but it's still an offensive act which will encourage terrorism not prevent it. Obama described the plans of Mr Jones as a "recruitment bonanza" for Al-Qaeda.
Obama also pointed out that if the burning did go ahead in Gainesville, Florida it would endanger US troops in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Whilst, William Hague, British foreign secretary, when asked how the burnings would affect British troops in Afghanistan replied "It certainly won't help."
It has also been suggested that it will not only be our troops who will be put at risk by the pastor's actions; Interpol has issued a global alert claiming the burning could instigate "violent attacks on innocent people". As a result of this warning, the US government has warned American tourists abroad to be careful and avoid areas where protests may take place.
Terry Jones, pastor of a small church in the sleepy town of Gainesville leads a congregation of around 50 people. He planned to hold a mass burning of Korans to commemorate 9/11.
What was planned to be a small, local ceremony has now become a major issue on the world stage, as a result of media and political intervention.
The US government finds itself in a tricky situation; officials cannot prevent Mr Jones as intervention would be against the US constitution's promise of freedom of speech. Yet, if the burning should go ahead, not only is it damaging to America's reputation but also poses huge security risks.
Comments made against the Koran burnings:
Downing Street; "Primarily this is an issue for the US, but clearly the government's view is that we would not condone the burning of any book. We would strongly oppose any attempt to offend any member of any religious or ethnic group. We are committed to religious tolerance."
OIC Secretary General (Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu); "The culture of peaceful co-existence and inter communal and inter-religious tolerance that the international community is trying to achieve is under threat from marginal and extremist fanatics."
William Hague; The burning of the Koran would be offensive not just to Muslims but to all supporters of religious freedom and tolerance worldwide. Eid is a time of celebration, charitable giving and family gathering. To seek to mar it in this calculated way would be selfish and provocative in the extreme."
Tony Blair; "I deplore the act of burning the Koran. It is disrespectful, wrong and will be widely condemned by people of all faiths and none. In no way does this represent the view of any sensible person in the West or any other part of the world. You do not have to be a Muslim to share a sense of deep concern at such a disrespectful way to treat the Holy Book of Islam. Rather than burn the Koran, I would encourage people to read it."
There has not been news yet as to whether Mr Jones plans to continue the Koran burnings; despite worldwide pressure for him to cancel his plans. Meanwhile the rest of us struggle to comprehend, as shown above, why we are having to persuade such a man, not to commit a KKK reminiscent offence in the supposedly tolerant society of today.
Wednesday, 8 September 2010
The Hague Plague Spreads...
The 'Hague Plague' is catching on across media nationwide...
Is he? Isn't he?
But is it really any of our business as to what the sexual orientation of our foreign secretary is?
Over the years, in politics, and indeed across society, it would seem attitudes regarding sexuality have become much more relaxed, almost to the extent that having gay MPs is practically mandatory within a party.
Being homosexual or even bisexual should not be an issue at all, except perhaps for Hague's wife Ffion. Neither should it matter to the general public as to whether Hague has been disloyal to his wife or not; politicians should be judged on how well they do their jobs, not how 'nice' they are in their private lives.
In an ideal world, parliament would be full of committed, sensible and intelligent people with the right political values who radiate loveliness to those surrounding them. But as always, the ideal world isn't achievable and the human race certainly isn't perfect. And of the many above qualities that make a politician; "loveliness" is certainly the lowest of my priorities.
If Wayne Rooney can cheat on his pregnant wife Coleen with a call girl, yet still be an impressive football player and loyal team member...
Then, William Hague can supposedly cheat on his wife with Christopher Myers, yet still successfully serve his country as foreign secretary...
I am trying to say that yes, we should judge a politician's character but only in those areas that apply to their work. The rest is private business; A line needs to be drawn.
The only reason it possibly should interest the public, is whether, if Mr Hague did have feelings for the young aide, this caused him to appoint him as a special adviser. But the media explosion following reports that Hague and Myers shared a room during the election campaign seems to have engulfed the real question; should Myers have been appointed as a spad?
It emerged that the aide was never included within an official list of spads published in June by Downing Street, therefore suggesting Christopher Myers was never officially appointed and so raising questions as to whether "the list", which was supposed to demonstrate how the coalition was cutting back on political appointments, was completed.
Cameron promised fewer spads would be used in the coalition to cut costs, limiting it to two spads per minister, however Hague's appointment of Mr Myers meant he had a total of three advisers.
There was also controversy as to whether 25 year old Myers had enough experience for the job and so perhaps Hague's 'soft spot' for Myers led to the appointment.
But the real issue of debate was overrun by the media's greed for a good sex story; leading to Hague having to make a very personal statement to the public and a man, who, for all we know, could have been a very successful advisor to the foreign secretary having to resign as a result of media pressure.
I wish William and Ffion well, I hope the media will now leave them alone and Christopher Myers will just become some distant memory...
I'd also like to express my condolences towards David Cameron. Political differences aside; I think we can all agree that we can appreciate how hard it is to lose someone so close.
Is he? Isn't he?
But is it really any of our business as to what the sexual orientation of our foreign secretary is?
Over the years, in politics, and indeed across society, it would seem attitudes regarding sexuality have become much more relaxed, almost to the extent that having gay MPs is practically mandatory within a party.
Being homosexual or even bisexual should not be an issue at all, except perhaps for Hague's wife Ffion. Neither should it matter to the general public as to whether Hague has been disloyal to his wife or not; politicians should be judged on how well they do their jobs, not how 'nice' they are in their private lives.
In an ideal world, parliament would be full of committed, sensible and intelligent people with the right political values who radiate loveliness to those surrounding them. But as always, the ideal world isn't achievable and the human race certainly isn't perfect. And of the many above qualities that make a politician; "loveliness" is certainly the lowest of my priorities.
If Wayne Rooney can cheat on his pregnant wife Coleen with a call girl, yet still be an impressive football player and loyal team member...
Then, William Hague can supposedly cheat on his wife with Christopher Myers, yet still successfully serve his country as foreign secretary...
I am trying to say that yes, we should judge a politician's character but only in those areas that apply to their work. The rest is private business; A line needs to be drawn.
The only reason it possibly should interest the public, is whether, if Mr Hague did have feelings for the young aide, this caused him to appoint him as a special adviser. But the media explosion following reports that Hague and Myers shared a room during the election campaign seems to have engulfed the real question; should Myers have been appointed as a spad?
It emerged that the aide was never included within an official list of spads published in June by Downing Street, therefore suggesting Christopher Myers was never officially appointed and so raising questions as to whether "the list", which was supposed to demonstrate how the coalition was cutting back on political appointments, was completed.
Cameron promised fewer spads would be used in the coalition to cut costs, limiting it to two spads per minister, however Hague's appointment of Mr Myers meant he had a total of three advisers.
There was also controversy as to whether 25 year old Myers had enough experience for the job and so perhaps Hague's 'soft spot' for Myers led to the appointment.
But the real issue of debate was overrun by the media's greed for a good sex story; leading to Hague having to make a very personal statement to the public and a man, who, for all we know, could have been a very successful advisor to the foreign secretary having to resign as a result of media pressure.
I wish William and Ffion well, I hope the media will now leave them alone and Christopher Myers will just become some distant memory...
I'd also like to express my condolences towards David Cameron. Political differences aside; I think we can all agree that we can appreciate how hard it is to lose someone so close.
Thursday, 19 August 2010
100 Days of Coalition...
So whilst on the whole, it appears the Canary-Yellow Bird is reasonably happy sitting within the clutches branches of the Green-Blue Tree, it would appear the real problems are occurring amongst the Tory party itself...
"A Blazing, Shouting, Grade-A Row" hit Whitehall as George Osbourne told Iain Duncan Smith he would have to find around £5 of savings for every £1 he spends on his welfare reform plans.
Iain Duncan Smith, Welfare Secretary and Former Tory Leader, aims to simplify the benefits system and create incentives to work. Although his reforms are expected to save money in the long term, he requires a £3bn initial start up cost to fund his radical plans.
£3bn which Osbourne originally refused to give.
Since the exposure of the row, George Osbourne has refused to admit that he and the former Tory leader have been involved in the rumoured tense disputes; describing the welfare reform as the "fundamentally progressive and fair thing to do" but described it as a "complex operation".
But allegedly, David Cameron himself had to step in on the behalf of Iain Duncan Smith at a meeting at Chequers.
As otherwise, there were fears that IDS might resign or use his influential role as former party leader to rally backbenchers against the Chancellor - potentially a huge blow for the stability of the Coalition. So the Treasury have agreed IDS can have the money, providing he could produce savings from elsewhere.
Presently, it would seem the "blaze" has been extinguished but perhaps over the next five years we will see this old rift rekindled...
"A Blazing, Shouting, Grade-A Row" hit Whitehall as George Osbourne told Iain Duncan Smith he would have to find around £5 of savings for every £1 he spends on his welfare reform plans.
Iain Duncan Smith, Welfare Secretary and Former Tory Leader, aims to simplify the benefits system and create incentives to work. Although his reforms are expected to save money in the long term, he requires a £3bn initial start up cost to fund his radical plans.
£3bn which Osbourne originally refused to give.
Since the exposure of the row, George Osbourne has refused to admit that he and the former Tory leader have been involved in the rumoured tense disputes; describing the welfare reform as the "fundamentally progressive and fair thing to do" but described it as a "complex operation".
But allegedly, David Cameron himself had to step in on the behalf of Iain Duncan Smith at a meeting at Chequers.
As otherwise, there were fears that IDS might resign or use his influential role as former party leader to rally backbenchers against the Chancellor - potentially a huge blow for the stability of the Coalition. So the Treasury have agreed IDS can have the money, providing he could produce savings from elsewhere.
Presently, it would seem the "blaze" has been extinguished but perhaps over the next five years we will see this old rift rekindled...
Tuesday, 10 August 2010
The New Lib Dem Party Anthem?: We're on a Highway to Hell...
"This is the first time a Liberal leader has stood at this dispatch box since Lloyd George in 1922."
As Clegg announces this from the unfamiliar territory of the dispatch box, the Chancellor, George Osbourne wears that all too familiar smug Tory-look which seems even more exuberant than usual...
'And after this five years of Tory hell it will be at least another 92 years until you stand there again...'
- Perhaps that's why.
Support for the Liberal Democrats has slumped to an all time low of a mere 16% since the beginning of the general election as voters feel the Lib Dems have lost their voice within the coalition government.
Whilst, it is feared almost a third (17/57) of the Lib Dem seats in Parliament could be at risk in the 2015 election as Labour support begins to recover.
Furthermore, the seats under threat include those of the Deputy Leader (Simon Hughes) and the Energy and Climate Change Secretary (Chris Huhne).
However, I think many Lib Dem supporters were simply expecting too much from the Lib Dems.
A coaliton was always going to involve comprimise and the Lib Dems were always going to have to give up more being the smaller party.
But Liberal progress in government has been made;
There will be a referendum on fairer votes (May 5th), Labour's ID card scheme will be scrapped, a Freedom Bill will be introduced, the Income Tax threshold will be raised by £1000 and a Bank Levy will be introduced; these are just a few of the major changes the Lib Dems have helped bring about within the Coalition.
In the words of Clegg, I still hope and believe "that this country will be more fair, more free and more liberal in 2015 as a result of us being part of government", and deserters must remember that ANYTHING is better than an all Tory government.
Just for the record, I can't stand ACDC but it does seem as though the coalition government could be the Lib Dems downfall if support continues to fall and therefore "I'm on a Highway to Hell..." springs to mind...
As Clegg announces this from the unfamiliar territory of the dispatch box, the Chancellor, George Osbourne wears that all too familiar smug Tory-look which seems even more exuberant than usual...
'And after this five years of Tory hell it will be at least another 92 years until you stand there again...'
- Perhaps that's why.
Support for the Liberal Democrats has slumped to an all time low of a mere 16% since the beginning of the general election as voters feel the Lib Dems have lost their voice within the coalition government.
Whilst, it is feared almost a third (17/57) of the Lib Dem seats in Parliament could be at risk in the 2015 election as Labour support begins to recover.
Furthermore, the seats under threat include those of the Deputy Leader (Simon Hughes) and the Energy and Climate Change Secretary (Chris Huhne).
However, I think many Lib Dem supporters were simply expecting too much from the Lib Dems.
A coaliton was always going to involve comprimise and the Lib Dems were always going to have to give up more being the smaller party.
But Liberal progress in government has been made;
There will be a referendum on fairer votes (May 5th), Labour's ID card scheme will be scrapped, a Freedom Bill will be introduced, the Income Tax threshold will be raised by £1000 and a Bank Levy will be introduced; these are just a few of the major changes the Lib Dems have helped bring about within the Coalition.
In the words of Clegg, I still hope and believe "that this country will be more fair, more free and more liberal in 2015 as a result of us being part of government", and deserters must remember that ANYTHING is better than an all Tory government.
Just for the record, I can't stand ACDC but it does seem as though the coalition government could be the Lib Dems downfall if support continues to fall and therefore "I'm on a Highway to Hell..." springs to mind...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
